4.2 Article

Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) Do Not Form Expectations Based on Their Partner's Outcomes

Journal

FOLIA PRIMATOLOGICA
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 56-70

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000328142

Keywords

Orangutan; Pongo pygmaeus; Inequity; Expectation; Convergent evolution; Social comparison; Great apes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF SES 0729244]
  2. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [0847351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several primate species form expectations based on others' outcomes, responding negatively when their outcomes differ from their partners'. The function and evolutionary pathway of this behavior are unknown, in part because all of the species which have been tested thus far share traits related to a gregarious lifestyle, intelligence, and cooperativeness. Our goal was to test whether inequity is a homology among primates or a convergence by comparing one species known to show social comparisons, the chimpanzee, to another great ape which differs on several of these life history characteristics. Using a protocol identical to one used previously with chimpanzees, we tested whether orangutans, an intelligent but predominantly solitary species with few opportunities to cooperate, responded similarly. To allow for a strong comparison with chimpanzees (and other species), we used socially housed adults of both sexes, tested with members of their social group. Orangutans did not respond negatively to inequity, supporting previous findings and indicating that inequity responses in apes are likely a convergence based on either sociality or cooperative tendency. These results in such closely related species highlight the need for additional comparative studies to understand better the function and evolution of social behaviors. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available