4.2 Article

Size frequency distributions of β-amyloid (4β) deposits: a comparative study of four neurodegenerative disorders

Journal

FOLIA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 240-249

Publisher

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/fn.2012.30524

Keywords

beta-amyloid (A beta); size frequency distribution; log-normal distribution; surface diffusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deposition of beta-amyloid (4), a 'signature' pathological lesion of Alzheimer's disease (AD), is also characteristic of Down's syndrome (DS), and has been observed in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). To determine whether the growth of A beta deposits was similar in these disorders, the size frequency distributions of the diffuse ('pre-amyloid') primitive ('neuritic'), and classic ('dense-cored') A beta deposits were compared in AD, DS, DLB, and CBD. All size distributions had essentially the same shape, Le., they were unimodal and positively skewed. Mean size of A beta deposits, however, varied between disorders. Mean diameters of the diffuse, primitive, and classic deposits were greatest in DS, DS and CBD, and DS, respectively, while the smallest deposits, on average, were recorded in DLB. Although the shape of the frequency distributions was approximately log-normal, the model underestimated the frequency of smaller deposits and overestimated the frequency of larger deposits in all disorders. A 'power-law' model fitted the size distributions of the primitive deposits in AD, DS, and DLB, and the diffuse deposits in AD. The data suggest: (1) similarities in size distributions of A beta deposits among disorders, (2) growth of deposits varies with subtype and disorder, (3) different factors are involved in the growth of the diffuse/primitive and classic deposits, and (4) log-normal and power-law models do not completely account for the size frequency distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available