Journal
FOLIA GEOBOTANICA
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 245-257Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12224-008-9012-y
Keywords
Bias; Floristics; Rarefaction effect; Species area relationship; Species richness; Tallgrass prairie; Taxonomic ratios
Categories
Funding
- NSF [EPS-0447262]
- Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
- EPA STAR/GRO
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The biodiversity crisis demands that scientists be careful in their application of quantitative methods, because misuse of biodiversity statistics can lead to trivial but real patterns (artifacts) or to false patterns (artifictions). While misuses such as biases in taxonomic ratios, standardization by dividing by area or individuals, and the rarefaction effect have been repeatedly recognized in the literature, they continue to appear regularly in the scientific literature. Here, we illustrate (using data from North American floras and the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve in Oklahoma, USA) examples of how artifacts and artifictions can lead to misinterpretation of biodiversity patterns. We urge biogeographers and ecologists to be vigilant when using biodiversity statistics, to avoid false interpretations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available