4.5 Article

Increase in oxidative stress biomarkers in dogs with ascending-descending myelomalacia following spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 353, Issue 1-2, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.04.003

Keywords

Spinal cord trauma; Secondary injury; A-D myelomalacia; 8-Isoprostane; Canine

Funding

  1. State of Indiana through the Center for Paralysis Research at Purdue University
  2. Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Disease Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple biochemical and immunohistochemical tests were performed to elucidate the role of oxidative stress during ascending-descending (A-D) myelomalacia by comparing dogs with this progressive terminal condition to dogs with chronic, focal spinal cord injuries (SCIs) and controls without SCI. Dog with A-D myelomalacia exhibited increased biochemical markers for oxidative stress, including 8-isoprostane F2 alpha and acrolein, as well as decreased endogenous glutathione with greatest changes occurring at the lesion center. Inflammation, as evident by the concentration of CD18 + phagocytes and hemorrhagic necrosis, was also exacerbated in the lesion of A-D myelomalacic spinal cord compared to focal SCI. The greatest differences in oxidative stress occurred at the lesion center and diminished distally in both spinal cords with A-D myelomalacia and focal SCIs. The spatial progression and time course of A-D myelomalacia are consistent with the development of secondary injury post-SCI. Ascending-descending myelomalacia is proposed as a clinical model that may further the understanding of the role of oxidative stress during secondary injury. Our results indicate that the pathology of A-D myelomalacia is also similar to subacute progressive ascending myelopathy in humans, which is characterized by recurrent neurodegeneration of spinal cord post-injury. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available