4.3 Article

Dianthus caryophyllus stems and Zantedeschia aethiopica petioles/pedicels show anatomical features indicating efficient photosynthesis

Journal

FLORA
Volume 206, Issue 4, Pages 360-364

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.07.004

Keywords

Dianthus caryophyllus; Green stems; Palisade parenchyma; Stem anatomy; Stem photosynthesis; Zantedeschia aethiopica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fine structure of the green stem of Dianthus caryophyllus, the leaf petiole and the flower pedicel of Zantedeschia aethiopica were studied using light and scanning electron microscopy. It was revealed that these non-foliar plant parts of both species possess epidermis with numerous stomata. Stomatal density of D. caryophyllus stem was found to be relatively high (79 vs 100 per mm(2) found on leaf surface). Z. aethiopica petioles and pedicels also possess numerous stomata (17 per mm(2)), yet stomatal density was found to be about half of that of leaves. Anatomical differences observed between petioles and pedicels were only minor. Stems of D. caryophyllus as well as petioles and pedicels of Z. aethiopica have a chlorenchyma-type tissue whose fine structure is quite similar to the leaf palisade chlorenchyma. Yet, the palisade of Z. aethiopica petioles and pedicels shows a peculiar arrangement: palisade cells are arranged with their long axis parallel to the longitudinal organ axis. Palisade tissue found in the aforementioned non-foliar plant organs in both species shows strong red chlorophyll auto-fluorescence under epi-fluorescence optics, consists of cells with abundant chloroplasts, possesses high percentage of intercellular spaces (13 and 20%, respectively) and its cells expose considerable part of their surface to the intercellular air. The fine structure of this stem palisade tissue along with the abundance of functional stomata found on the epidermis may support efficient photosynthesis. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available