4.3 Article

Who refuses safe but stigmatized marine products due to concern about radioactive contamination?

Journal

FISHERIES SCIENCE
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages 1119-1133

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-018-1250-1

Keywords

Logit model; Latent class model; Boycott countermeasure; Ecolabel; Origin; Fish

Categories

Funding

  1. Fisheries Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radioactive contamination from the Fukushima disaster has undermined the seafood caught around the area. Approximately 20% of general consumers are reported to avoid seafood from Fukushima, even though it has not been found to exceed the Japanese criteria of radioactivity since April 2015. Based on a survey of more than 2000 domestic consumers in Japan, this study investigated the characteristics of those who boycotted safe marine products from the devastated region, using conjoint analysis with a latent class model. The attributes (levels) included price, three prefectural origins (including Fukushima and adjacent prefectures), six local origins, and two ecolabels targeting white fish meat. The latent class model divided participants into three classes: boycotters (27.5%), consumers devaluing cod (41.0%), and ordinary consumers (31.5%). Boycotters neither believed the radioactive test results from any entity nor bought seafood frequently. Furthermore, they tended not to recognize the Marine Stewardship Council, earned more, and were relatively older than the average.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available