4.5 Article

Can steepness of the stock-recruitment relationship be estimated in fishery stock assessment models?

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 254-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.03.001

Keywords

Pacific Coast groundfish stocks; Steepness; Stock assessment; Stock-recruitment; Stock synthesis

Categories

Funding

  1. Southwest Fisheries Science Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steepness of the stock recruitment relationship is one of the most uncertain and critical quantities in fishery stock assessment and management. Steepness is defined as the fraction of recruitment from a virgin population obtained when the spawners are at 20% of the virgin level. Steepness directly relates to productivity and yield and is an important element in the calculation of many management reference points. Stock recruitment relationships have traditionally been estimated from time series of recruitment and spawning biomass, but recently interest has arisen regarding the ability to estimate steepness inside fishery stock assessment models. We evaluated the ability to estimate steepness of the Beverton-Holt stock recruitment relationship using simulation analyses for twelve US Pacific Coast fish stocks. A high proportion of steepness estimates from the simulated data and the original data occur at the bounds for steepness and the proportion decreased as the true steepness decreased. The simulation results indicate that, in most cases, steepness was estimated with moderate to low precision and moderate to high bias. The poorly estimated steepness indicates that often there is little information in the data about this quantity. However, reliable estimation is attainable with a good contrast of spawning stock biomass for relatively unproductive stocks when the model is correctly specified. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available