Journal
FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 102, Issue 1-2, Pages 152-159Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.11.005
Keywords
Chinook salmon; Mixed stock analysis; Strontium isotopes; Microsatellite DNA; Otolith
Categories
Funding
- Port Orford Ocean Resources Team (POORT)
- ODFW's Fish Restoration and Enhancement Fund
- Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Genetic stock identification (GSI) is used extensively in fisheries applications and otolith isotopic composition (Sr-87/Sr-86) can be used to identify provenance in freshwater and anadromous species; however, each approach has inherent limitations. The potential to combine these methodologies to improve discrimination among populations has yet to be realized. In this study, GSI was combined with information from otolith Sr-87/Sr-86 and artificial tags (Coded Wire Tags, CWTs) to: (1) determine the stock composition of a Chinook salmon ocean terminal area fishery conducted near the mouth of the Elk River in southern Oregon, U.S.A. and resolve intractable discrimination between hatchery and naturally spawned fish; and (2) evaluate the efficacy of a spatial management boundary designed to maximize collection of Elk River hatchery fish and minimize collection of naturally spawned fish from the adjacent Sixes River. A test fishery was established within two experimental areas: (1) a traditionally open, southern fishing area (SFA); and (2) a traditionally closed, northern fishing area (NFA). There were four potential sources of Chinook salmon within each area. GSI, otolith (87)sr/Sr-86, and CWT data were used in a hierarchical manner to estimate the proportions of fish within each fishing area that were: (1) from outside of the Elk and Sixes Rivers (mean = 0.118 and 0.074 for the SFA and NFA, respectively); (2) produced at the Elk River hatchery (0.377 and 0.372); (3) naturally spawned in the Sixes River (0.254 and 0.278); and (4) naturally spawned in the Elk River (0.251 and 0.277). As stock composition was similar in the two areas, the spatial boundary appears to be an ineffective conservation tool. The combination of genetic and ecological markers can improve mixture estimates and generate information at scales more relevant to conservation and management efforts. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available