4.5 Article

Mortality impact of recreational angling techniques and hook types on Trachynotus ovatus (Linnaeus, 1758) following catch-and-release

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 95, Issue 2-3, Pages 365-369

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.08.007

Keywords

Post-release mortality; Mediterranean; Trachynotus ovatus; Passive angling; Circle hooks; Sustainable development

Categories

Funding

  1. FOGAIBA of Balearic government
  2. ROQUER [CTM2005-00283]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of the Spanish Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the post-release mortality (PRM) following catch-and-release in Trachynotus ovatus, one of the main target species of north-western Mediterranean recreational fisheries. In this study, we observed the line-caught fish for 10d in a holding tank in order to investigate the independence and impact on mortality of several explanatory variables, including fish size, surface temperature, anatomical hooking location, bleeding, hook type, and line cutting. We observed a total PRM of 24.1% and the most important mortality factor by fir was the anatomical position of the hook. Anatomically deeper hooking events were highly correlated with fish size and the presence of blood during hooking injuries. The PRM obtained in this study was higher than values reported in previous Studies of this species, mainly because we considered the effects of passive angling techniques. Passive angling increased the incidence of deep hooking and consequently increased mortality compared to active angling. This technique also led to an increase in deep hooking by circle hooks. Therefore, we recommend that active angling techniques be encouraged and we emphasize the need for education on the correct use of circle hooks. This Study provides guidelines to managers, scientists, and anglers that will promote sustainable development of the recreational fisheries of the Mediterranean. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available