4.2 Article

Explaining recreational angling catch rates of Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis: the role of natural and fishing-related environmental factors

Journal

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2-3, Pages 187-200

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12000

Keywords

catchability; diary; recreational fishing; sex-specific exploitation; starvation

Categories

Funding

  1. European FIFG
  2. State of M-V
  3. Adaptfish-Project through a grant within the Pact for Innovation and Research by the Leibniz-Community
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the project Besatzfisch
  5. Program for Social-Ecological Research [01UU0907]
  6. HIT Umwelt-und Naturschutz Stiftungs GmbH, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angling catch records are frequently used to reveal fish population developments. It is therefore important to understand the determinants of angling catches. This study focused on angler-related, biotic and abiotic factors influencing catchability of Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis L. A multi-lake (21 lakes) study based on angling diaries collected in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany (2006/2007), found that angler-related factors such as fishing experience, species preference and bait/lure type had a large impact on perch catch rates. Additionally, environmental conditions (nutritional status and water transparency) affected either the size or the number of perch caught by anglers. Catch rates varied seasonally, which was confirmed by an experimental fishery on a gravel pit (2008). This portion of the study showed that altered food availabilities in the course of the year caused food limitation in perch, which in turn facilitated high catch rates and female-biased exploitation in autumn. It is concluded that both angler-related and abiotic factors interact affecting perch catch rates and size of perch captured in recreational angling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available