4.7 Article

Enhanced innate immune parameters in Labeo rohita (Ham.) following oral administration of Bacillus subtilis

Journal

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 168-172

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.10.008

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis; Labeo rohita; respiratory burst activity; serum bactericidal activity; differential leukocyte counts; Aeromonas hydrophila O : 18

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study assessed the use of Bacillus subtilis in fish as a probiotic. The bacterium was administered orally at three different doses 0.5 X 10(7) (T-2), 1 X 10(7) (T-3), 1.5 x 10(7) (T-4) cfu/g feed to Labeo rohita for two weeks. The positive control group (T-1) and negative control group (T-5,T-) were fed feed without B. subtilis for the same period. On the 15th day blood and serum were sampled to determine respiratory burst activity (NBT assay), differential leukocyte counts (DLC) and serum bactericidal activity. Fishes were challenged intraperitoneally with Aeromonas hydrophila 0:18 after two weeks in the treatment groups (T2, T3 and T4) and also in the positive control group(T-1), while the negative control group (T5) was challenged with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) only. The respiratory burst activity and DLC were assessed on the 3rd day post-challenge. B. subtilis treated fish showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) respiratory burst activity and bactericidal activity during the pre-challenge compared with the control groups. The highest respiratory burst activity (0.37 +/- 0.03) and serum bactericidal activity were recorded in the group (T-4) fed feed containing B. subtilis at 1.5 x 10(7) cfu/g feed. Granulocyte numbers were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in treatment groups in comparison to the control in both the pre- and post-challenge periods. The result suggests that B. subtilis can enhance certain innate immune responses in rohu. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available