4.7 Article

Monospecies and multispecies probiotic formulations produce different systemic and local immunostimulatory effects in the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurato L.)

Journal

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 1-2, Pages 114-123

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.011

Keywords

Lactobacillus delbrueckii lactis; Bacillus subtilis; probiotic formulations; innate immunity; gut; IgM; gilthead seabream; Sparus aurata

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of the oral administration of heat-inactivated Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. lactis and Bacillus subtilis, individually or combined, on gilthead seabream immune responses were investigated both systemically and locally in the gut. In a first experiment, seabream (65 g) were fed for 3 weeks different diets supplemented with 1 x 10(7) CFU g(-1) Lactobacillus, 1 x 10(7) CFU g(-1) Bacillus, or 0.5 x 10(7) CFU g(-1) Lactobacillus plus 0.5 x 10(7) CFU g(-1) Bacillus. Controls were fed non -supplemented diet. Six fish per group were sampled at the end of the trial and some humoral and cellular systemic innate immune parameters were evaluated., Feeding the mixture of the two killed bacteria species significantly increased natural complement, serum peroxidase and phagocytic activities compared with controls. In a second experiment, juvenile seabream (13 g) were fed for 3 weeks the same experimental diets and total serum IgM and numbers of gut IgM(+) cells and acidophilic granulocytes were evaluated. All these parameters were significantly higher in the multispecies probiotic group compared to monospecies and control fed groups. The advantages provided by administration of killed probiotic bacteria as well as multispecies versus monospecies formulations are discussed in light of the results obtained and for their possible application in aquacultural practices. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available