4.5 Article

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and Parkinson's disease in a population with high ultraviolet radiation exposure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 352, Issue 1-2, Pages 88-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.043

Keywords

Vitamin D; Ultraviolet radiation; Parldnson's disease; Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms; TaqI; ApaI

Funding

  1. NIH [1R03ES017139]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: A high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency has been reported in Parkinson's disease (PD). Epidemiologic studies examining variability in genes involved in vitamin D metabolism have not taken into account level of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). We examined whether exposure to UVR (as a surrogate for vitamin D levels) and variations in the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) are associated with PD. Methods: Within a geographical information system (GIS) we linked participants' geocoded residential address data to ground level UV data to estimate historical exposure to UVR. Six SNPs in VDR were genotyped in non-Hispanic Caucasian subjects. Results: Average lifetime UVR exposure levels were >5000 Wh/m(2), which was higher than levels for populations in previous studies, and UVR exposure did not differ between cases and controls. Homozygotes for the rs731236 TT (major allele) genotype had a 31% lower risk of PD risk (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.49,0.98: p = 0.04 for TT vs. TC + CC). The rs7975232 GG (minor allele) genotype was also associated with decreased risk of PD (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.42,0.93; p = 0.02 for GG vs. TG + TT). The association between PD risk and a third locus, rs1544410 (BsmI), was not statistically significant after adjustment for covariates, although there was a trend for lower risk with the GG genotype. Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence that VDR polymorphisms may modulate risk of PD in a population highly exposed to UVR throughout lifetime. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available