4.6 Article

Using artificial reaction force to design compliant mechanism with multiple equality displacement constraints

Journal

FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Volume 45, Issue 8-9, Pages 555-568

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2009.03.005

Keywords

Topology optimization; Compliant mechanism; Equality constraint; Reaction force; Mesh adaptation

Funding

  1. CIOMP
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [1883/9-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monolithic compliant mechanisms are elastic workpieces which transmit force and displacement from an input position to an output position. Continuum topology optimization is suitable to generate the optimized topology, shape and size of such compliant mechanisms. The optimization strategy for a single input single output compliant mechanism under volume constraint is known to be best implemented using an optimality criteria for the design of compliant mechanisms which are subject to multiple outputs and multiple constraints. Therefore an optimization model that is subject to multiple design constraints is required. With regard to the design problem of compliant mechanisms subject to multiple equality displacement constraints and an area constraint, we here present a unified sensitivity analysis procedure based on artificial reaction forces, in which the key idea is built upon the Lagrange multiplier method. Because the resultant sensitivity expression obtained by this procedure already compromises the effects of all the equality displacement constraints, a simple optimization method, such as the optimality criteria method, can then be used to implement an area constraint. Mesh adaptation and anisotropic filtering method are used to obtain clearly defined monolithic compliant mechanisms without obvious hinges. Numerical examples in 2D and 3D based on linear small deformation analysis are presented to illustrate the success of the method. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available