4.7 Article

Rapid determination of single-stalk and population lodging resistance strengths and an assessment of the stem lodging wind speeds for winter wheat

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.014

Keywords

Triticum aestivum L.; Lodging resistance; Electronic measuring device; Population lodging resistance; Stem lodging wind speed

Categories

Funding

  1. Major Projects for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province, China [081100110500]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Plan Project [2011BAD07B02]
  3. Henan Institute of Science and Technology [2011002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lodging is a major limiting factor on wheat production worldwide but due to experimental restrictions, there is little accurate information on wheat single-stalk lodging resistance strength, particularly at the population level. The single-stalk and population lodging resistance strength of 10 winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) were measured in the field between 2010 and 2012 using a crop lodging resistance electronic measuring device and, based on the population lodging resistance strength, wind speed and wind pressure theory, the population stem lodging wind speed for each wheat variety was estimated. The single-stalk lodging resistance strength was 2.50-10.79 g-force stalk(-1); the population lodging resistance strength was 20.35-65.06 N m(-1) and the population stem lodging wind speed was 11.93-24.69 m s(-1) depending on variety and the growth stage. These results were consistent with general observations taken in the field and suggest that the method used in this study for population lodging resistance measurement and lodging wind speed evaluation may be suitable for the rapid identification of wheat variety lodging resistance in the field. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available