4.7 Article

Understanding physiological processes associated with yield-trait relationships in modern wheat varieties

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 316-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.023

Keywords

Genetic changes; Nitrogen uptake; Nitrogen translocation; Winter wheat

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071864]
  2. Program for Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [2010HASTIT034]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [209074, 2009CB118606]
  4. Special Fund for Agriculture Profession [201103003]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22780013] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New insights into changes in physiological processes associated with genetic gains in yield potential are essential for improved understanding of yield-limiting factors. Our field study was conducted at two sites with three N levels and 15 modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. The goal was to evaluate yield components, time courses of dry matter production, and N accumulation among different yield categories, and to determine physiological processes associated with yield-trait relationships. Close correlations were observed between yield and dry matter production after the stem elongation stage, particularly post-anthesis. Similar close correlations were observed between grain yield and N accumulation over the whole growing season, except for the re-greening stage. No positive correlation was found between yield and harvest index. Differences in dry matter production among different yield categories began at anthesis; differences in N accumulation emerged even earlier. We conclude that consistent increases in dry matter production (especially post-anthesis) and N accumulation are crucial for further improvements in wheat yield-trait relationships. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available