4.4 Article

Coffee Drinking and Cutaneous Melanoma Risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju421

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Yale-National Cancer Institute (NCI) predoctoral training grant [T32 CA105666]
  2. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cutaneous melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States. Modifiable risk factors, with the exception of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR), are poorly understood. Coffee contains numerous bioactive compounds and may be associated inversely with melanoma. However, previous epidemiological evidence is limited. Methods: Coffee intake was assessed at baseline with a food frequency questionnaire in the National Institutes of Health-AARP prospective cohort study. Among 447 357 non-Hispanic whites who were cancer-free at baseline, 2904 incident cases of malignant melanoma were identified during 4 329 044 person-years of follow-up, with a median of 10.5 years of followup. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for coffee intake and subsequent melanoma risk with non-coffee drinkers as the reference group. Statistical tests were two-sided, and P values less than .05 were interpreted as statistically significant. Results: The highest category of coffee intake was inversely associated with malignant melanoma (>= 4 cups/day: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.93, P-trend =.01). This association was statistically significant for caffeinated (>= 4 cups/day: HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.89, P-trend =.01) but not for decaffeinated coffee (P-trend =.55). Conclusions: Higher coffee intake was associated with a modest decrease in risk of melanoma in this large US cohort study. Additional investigations of coffee intake and its constituents, particularly caffeine, with melanoma are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available