4.7 Article

Telomeres and human reproduction

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.039

Keywords

Reproductive aging; telomeres

Funding

  1. CAPES Foundation
  2. Ministry of Education of Brazil
  3. Sao Paolo University
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  5. Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, New York University (National Institutes of Health) [1UL1RR029893]
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR029893] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telomeres mediate biologic aging in organisms as diverse as plants, yeast, and mammals. We propose a telomere theory of reproductive aging that posits telomere shortening in the female germ line as the primary driver of reproductive aging in women. Experimental shortening of telomeres in mice, which normally do not exhibit appreciable oocyte aging, and which have exceptionally long telomeres, recapitulates the aging phenotype of human oocytes. Telomere shortening in mice reduces synapsis and chiasmata, increases embryo fragmentation, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, spindle dysmorphologies, and chromosome abnormalities. Telomeres are shorter in the oocytes from women undergoing in vitro fertilization, who then produce fragmented, aneuploid embryos that fail to implant. In contrast, the testes are replete with spermatogonia that can rejuvenate telomere reserves throughout the life of the man by expressing telomerase. Differences in telomere dynamics across the life span of men and women may have evolved because of the difference in the inherent risks of aging on reproduction between men and women. Additionally, growing evidence links altered telomere biology to endometriosis and gynecologic cancers, thus future studies should examine the role of telomeres in pathologies of the reproductive tract. (Fertil Steril (R) 2013;99:23-9. (C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available