4.7 Article

Five years' experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages 1994-1999

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.004

Keywords

Fertility preservation; oocyte vitrification; cancer; social freezing; newborns

Funding

  1. Merck Serono
  2. MSD
  3. Ferring
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Madrid, Spain [FIS PI11/02747]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the results of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications. Design: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study performed between March 2007 and June 2012. Setting: University-affiliated infertility clinics. Patient(s): Of 560 nononcological patients and 475 oncological patients, we performed 1,080 oocyte vitrification cycles, 725 for nonmedical reasons and 355 in patients affected with cancer. Cycle outcome is presented, including 30 women who returned to use their frozen eggs with, 20 pregnancies obtained, 6 newborns, and 8 ongoing pregnancies. Intervention(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, oocyte retrieval, warming of oocytes, and ET in those who already came back. Main Outcome Measure(s): Days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropins, estrogen (E) and P levels, number of oocytes retrieved and vitrified, pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s): Comparable results were obtained in both groups of patients, with lower total dose of gonadotropins used and lower serum E-2 levels in patients affected with cancer. Frozen/thawed oocytes performed similarly in both groups. Conclusion(s): Patients who vitrify eggs for medical or nonmedical reasons perform similarly, as observed in this large series. This technique offers realistic expectations to both groups of patients to have a child with their own eggs. These data could be used to adequately counsel our patients. (Fertil Steril (R) 2013; 99: 1994-9. (C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available