4.7 Article

Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 608-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004

Keywords

IVF; preimplantation genetic screening; comprehensive chromosomal screening; embryo biopsy; blastocyst biopsy

Funding

  1. EMD Serono
  2. Ferring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A consistent requirement for all preimplantation genetic testing is the need to obtain DNA from the oocyte or embryo. Currently this sample is attained through biopsy of one or both polar bodies, blastomere biopsy at the cleavage stage, or trophectoderm biopsy after blastulation. Selecting the optimal time for biopsy requires careful consideration. Polar body biopsy is less invasive and provides more time for analysis but fails to capture as many as one in three embryonic aneuploidies. Additionally, the inability to readily distinguish nondysjunction from premature separation of sister chromatids greatly limits the predictive value of the technique and may lead to an overdiagnosis of aneuploidy in as many as 45% of cases with first polar-body errors. Cleavage-stage biopsy provides adequate samples but is detrimental to the embryo. The adverse effect of blastomere biopsy may result in approximately two of every five reproductively competent embryos losing their ability to implant and sustain development. Trophectoderm biopsy does not adversely impact the embryos. However, for the majority of clinical programs without a genetics laboratory, vitrification would be necessary to allow time for the genetic analysis. Although this extends the time required for treatment, clinical outcomes are equivalent after transfer of euploid blasts during fresh IVF and cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles, so that excellent outcomes are maintained. At present the blastocyst stage is the optimal time to perform biopsies for preimplantation genetic testing. ((C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available