4.7 Article

Methylation status of imprinted genes DLK1-GTL2, MEST (PEG1), ZAC (PLAGL1), and LINE-1 elements in spermatozoa of normozoospermic men, unlike H19 imprinting control regions, is not associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous miscarriages

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 1668-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.107

Keywords

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage; IG-DMR; MEST; PLAGL1; normozoospermic; imprinting; DNA methylation

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/PR12826/MED/29/138/2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study methylation aberrations in spermatozoa at developmentally important imprinted regions to ascertain their role in early embryo loss in idiopathic recurrent spontaneous miscarriages (RSM). Design: Case-control study. Setting: Academic research setting at National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Parel, Mumbai. Patient(s): Male partners of couples with a history of RSM and male partners of couples with proven fertility (control group). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): DNA methylation levels at imprinting control regions of DLK1-GTL2, MEST (PEG1), and ZAC (PLAGL1) by Epityper Massarray and global methylation levels as measured by LINE-1 methylation and anti-5-methyl cytosine antibody in spermatozoa of 23 men in control group and 23 men in RSM group. Result(s): We did not observe any aberration in the total methylation levels in any of the imprinted genes or global methylation analyzed. Conclusion(s): Our results indicate that paternal methylation aberrations at imprinting control regions of DLK1-GTL2, MEST (PEG1), and ZAC (PLAGL1) and global methylation levels are not associated with idiopathic RSM and may not be good epigenetic markers (unlike the H-19 imprinting control region) for diagnosis of idiopathic RSM. ((c) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available