4.7 Article

Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: a case-control study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 212-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.039

Keywords

Endometriosis; attractiveness; body mass index; breast size; waist-to-hip ratio

Funding

  1. University of Milan School of Medicine [12-01-5068118-00067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate physical attractiveness in women with and without endometriosis. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Academic hospital. Patient(s): Three hundred nulliparous women. Intervention(s): Assessment of attractiveness by four independent female and male observers. Main Outcome Measure(s): A graded attractiveness rating scale. Result(s): A total of 31 of 100 women in the rectovaginal endometriosis group (cases) were judged as attractive or very attractive, compared with 8 of 100 in the peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis group and 9 of 100 in the group of subjects without endometriosis. A higher proportion of cases first had intercourse before age 18 (53%, 39%, and 30%, respectively). The mean +/- SD body mass index in women with rectovaginal endometriosis, in those with other disease forms, and in those without endometriosis was, respectively, 21.0 +/- 2.5, 21.3 +/- 3.3, and 22.1 +/- 3.6. The median (interquartile range) waist-to-hip ratio and breast-to-underbreast ratio were, respectively, 0.75 (0.71-0.81), 0.76 (0.71-0.81), and 0.78 (0.73-0.83), and 1.15 (1.12-1.20), 1.14 (1.10-1.17), and 1.15 (1.11-1.18). Conclusion(s): Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups. Moreover, they had a leaner silhouette, larger breasts, and an earlier coitarche. (Fertil Steril (R) 2013;99:212-8. (C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available