4.7 Article

In vitro fertilization and breast cancer: is there cause for concern?

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 334-340

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.019

Keywords

In vitro fertilization; breast cancer; Cox regression; hazard ratios

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/K006525/1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the incidence rate of breast cancer in a cohort of women undergoing treatment for infertility, comparing the rate in women who had in vitro fertilization (IVF) with those who did not. Design: Population-based cohort study using linked hospital and registry data. Setting: Hospital. Patient(s): All women aged 20-44 years seeking hospital investigation and treatment for infertility in Western Australia during the period 1983-2002 (n = 21,025). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Hazard ratios (HRs) for breast cancer. Result(s): There was no overall increase in the rate of breast cancer in women who had IVF (HR 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.36), but there was an increased rate in women who commenced IVF at a young age. Women who commenced hospital infertility treatment at 24 years and required IVF had an unadjusted HR of breast cancer of 1.59 (95% CI 1.05-2.42) compared with women of the same age who had infertility treatment but no IVF. When adjusted for late age at first delivery, which is associated with an increased rate of breast cancer, and delivery of twins and higher-order multiples, which is associated with a decreased rate of breast cancer, the HR remained elevated at 1.56 (95% CI 1.01-2.40). Hazard ratios were not elevated in women who commenced treatment at age 40 and required IVF (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62-1.22). Conclusion(s): Commencing IVF treatment at a young age is associated with an increased rate of breast cancer. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:334-40. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available