4.7 Article

Mental, psychomotor, neurologic, and behavioral outcomes of 2-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic screening: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 165-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.081

Keywords

Cerebral palsy; child; follow-up; IVF; neurodevelopmental outcomes; preimplantation genetic screening

Funding

  1. University Medical Center Groningen [754510]
  2. Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [945-03-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. Design: Prospective, assessor-blinded, follow-up study of children born to women randomly assigned to in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with or without PGS. Setting: University Medical Center, Groningen, and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Patient(s): Fifty-four PGS children and 77 controls. Intervention(s): PGS. Main Outcome Measure(s): Mental, psychomotor, neurologic, and behavioral outcomes in 2-year-old children as measured with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, the Hempel neurologic examination, and the Child Behavior Check List. Result(s): The mental, psychomotor, and behavioral outcomes at 2 years in children born after IVF with and without PGS were similar overall. The PGS children showed lower neurologic optimality scores than the control children. Scores on all tests were within the normal range. Conclusion(s): Conception with PGS does not seem to be associated with impaired mental, psychomotor, or behavioral outcomes by age 2. However, the lower neurologic optimality scores found in the PGS children may signal less favorable long-term neurologic outcomes in PGS children. Our findings stress the need for safety evaluations with new assisted reproductive techniques before large-scale implementation. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;96:165-9. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available