4.7 Editorial Material

Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.143

Keywords

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; in vitro fertilization (IVF); endometrial thickness; inadequate endometrium; implantation; pregnancy chance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess whether inadequate, thin endometrium (< 7 mm), after failure to expand with standard treatment options, will be responsive to cytokine treatment. Design: Prospective cohort study of four patients. Setting: Two independent IVF centers in New York City. Patient(s): Four consecutive women undergoing IVF who, after standard endometrial preparation, still demonstrated highly inadequate endometrium. Intervention(s): Transvaginal endometrial perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometrial thickness on day of ET, with pregnancy as secondary endpoint. Result(s): We report successful endometrial expansion to at least minimal thickness of 7 mm after uterine perfusion with G-CSF in four patients previously resistant to treatment with estrogen and vasodilators. All four patients therefore reached ET, and all four also conceived, although one pregnancy required termination because of intramural, corneal ectopic location. Endometrial expansion to minimal thickness occurred within approximately 48 hours from infusion. Conclusion(s): Uterine perfusion with G-CSF represents a promising new tool for the currently mostly intractable problem of inadequate, thin endometrium. This treatment also deserves further investigation for its potential to improve implantation chances in association with IVF and, therefore, pregnancy rates. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;95: 2123.e13-e17. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available