4.7 Article

Dietary patterns and difficulty conceiving: a nested case-control study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages 1149-1153

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.034

Keywords

Dietary pattern; difficulty getting pregnant; principal component analysis; diet; Mediterranean; dietary pattern; Western

Funding

  1. Spanish Government from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PI050514, RTIC 06/0045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate potential associations between dietary patterns (defined using factor analysis) and difficulty conceiving. Design: Case-control study nested in a Spanish cohort of university graduates (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra [SUN] Project). Setting: Female university graduates all over Spain participating in the SUN Project. Patient(s): A total of 485 women, aged 20-45 years, reporting having presented with difficulty getting pregnant, and 1,669 age-matched controls who had at least one child. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Reported difficulty getting pregnant. Data were collected from baseline and follow-up questionnaires of the SUN Project. Result(s): Two dietary patterns were identified. They were labeled as Mediterranean-type and Western-type patterns. A lower risk of difficulty getting pregnant was apparent in the highest quartile of adherence to the Mediterranean-type pattern compared with the lowest quartile (odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.95). Greater adherence to the Western-type dietary pattern showed no association with this outcome. Conclusion(s): A greater adherence to the Mediterranean-type dietary pattern may enhance fertility. Further evidence about the relationship between this dietary pattern and fertility is needed to develop nutritional interventions for women desiring to get pregnant. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;96:1149-53. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available