4.7 Article

The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 409-U479

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046

Keywords

Infertility; quality of life; psychology; treatment; assessment; burden; assisted reproductive technologies; in vitro fertilization

Funding

  1. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology
  2. American Society for Reproductive Medicine
  3. Merck-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
  4. Merck-Serono

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To develop the first international instrument to measure fertility quality of life, FertiQoL, in men and women experiencing fertility problems, to evaluate the preliminary psychometric properties of this new tool and to translate FertiQoL into multiple languages. Design: Survey. Setting: Online and fertility clinics in USA, Australia/New Zealand, Canada, and United Kingdom. Participants: A total of 1,414 people with fertility problems. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): FertiQoL. Result(s): FertiQoL consists of 36 items that assess core (24 items) and treatment-related (10 items) quality of life as well as overall life and physical health (2 items). Cronbach reliability statistics for the Core and Treatment FertiQoL (and subscales) were satisfactory, in the range of 0.72 and 0.92. Sensitivity analyses showed that FertiQoL detected expected relations between quality of life and gender, parity, and support seeking. FertiQoL was translated into 20 languages by the same translation team, with each translation verified by local bilingual fertility experts. Conclusion(s): FertiQoL is a reliable measure of the impact of fertility problems and its treatment on quality of life. Future research should establish its use in cross-cultural research and clinical work. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;96:409-15. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available