4.7 Article

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 888-899

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.022

Keywords

Unexplained infertility; FASTT Trial; intrauterine insemination; in vitro fertilization

Funding

  1. Ferring
  2. Organon
  3. Serono
  4. Serono and General Electric,
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. Duramed
  7. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  8. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [R01 HD38561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the value of gonadotropin/ intrauterine insemination (FSH/IUI) therapy for infertile women aged 21-39 years. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic medical center associated with a private infertility center. Patient(s): Couples with unexplained infertility. Intervention(s): Couples were randomized to receive either conventional treatment (n = 247) with three cycles of clomiphene citrate (CC)/IUI, three cycles of FSH/IUI, and up to six cycles of IVF or an accelerated treatment (n 256) that omitted the three cycles of FSH/IUI. Main Outcome Measure(s): The time it took to establish a pregnancy that led to a live birth and cost-effectiveness, defined as the ratio of the sum of all health insurance charges between randomization and delivery divided by the number of couples delivering at least one live-born baby. Result(s): An increased rate of pregnancy was observed in the accelerated arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.56) compared with the conventional arm. Median time to pregnancy was 8 and 11 months in the accelerated and conventional arms, respectively. Per cycle pregnancy rates for CC/IUI, FSH/IUI, and IVF were 7.6%, 9.8%, and 30.7%, respectively. Average charges per delivery were $9,800 lower (95% CI, $25,100 lower to $3,900 higher) in the accelerated arm compared to conventional treatment. The observed incremental difference was a savings of $2,624 per couple for accelerated treatment and 0.06 more deliveries. Conclusion(s): A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that FSH/IUI treatment was of no added value. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 888-99. (c) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available