4.7 Article

A prospective, randomized trial on the effect of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 511-519

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.077

Keywords

Embryo development; low oxygen; poor responders; pregnancy rate; prospective randomized study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess whether the embryo cultivation at different oxygen tensions had any effect on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: University clinical center. Patient(s): Women undergoing ICSI (n = 647). Intervention(s): Culturing of embryos, either at 6% CO2, 5% O-2, 89% N-2, or at 6% CO2 in air. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rates (PR). Secondary outcomes: cumulative PRs, implantation, and embryo quality, for both treatment groups and clinical outcomes for subgroups (optimal cycles, poor responders, older women). Result(s): Although low oxygen resulted in a higher proportion of good day 2 embryos (0.547 +/- 0.021 vs. 0.39 +/- 0.019) and optimal blastocysts (0.162 +/- 0.199 vs. 0.083 +/- 0.128), the ongoing PRs (31.6% vs. 27.1%) and implantation rates (28.8% vs. 25.2%) were similar in both oxygen groups. Low oxygen caused a higher cumulative PR (38% vs. 28.3%) in the main group and a higher PR in the poor responder subgroup (23% vs. 9.8%) with embryo transfers performed mostly on day 3. Conclusion(s): The use of reduced oxygen in IVF is reasonable, irrespective of the duration of embryo culture. It improves embryo development and cumulative PR and is also recommended in poor responding cycles. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;94:511-9. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available