4.7 Article

Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 510-516

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.148

Keywords

Fertilization rate; cleavage rate; oocyte cryopreservation; pronuclear zygote morphology; propanediol; slow-freezing; top-quality embryos; vitrification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To verify whether the morphologic evaluation of zygotes and embryos derived from thawed oocytes could provide some relevant information regarding their developmental performance. Design: Fertilization, zygote, and embryo morphology from sibling fresh and frozen oocytes was compared. Setting: Reproductive Medicine Unit, Societa Italiana Studi Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy. Patient(s): Two hundred thirty-four patients underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles from which 1,101 spare metaphase II oocytes were cryopreserved. Subsequently, 256 thawing cycles were per-formed, and 997 oocytes were thawed. Intervention(s): Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed on both fresh and frozen oocytes. Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization rates, pronuclear zygote morphology, and embryo cleavage rates. Result(s): Thawed oocytes had lower chances of being fertilized and developing into top-quality zygotes and regularly cleaving embryos when compared with sibling fresh oocytes irrespective of female age. As a result, the percentage of transferred cycles was significantly lower in frozen cycles compared with fresh cycles (79% and 93%, respectively); the proportion of transferred top-quality embryos followed the same trend. Conclusion(s): Reduced fertilization and cleavage rates in frozen cycles when compared with sibling fresh oocytes suggest that, even if surviving thawing, the process of slow freezing has a negative impact on the potential of further growth that is evident as early as the first cleavage divisions. (Fertil Steril(R) 20 10;93:510-6. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available