4.7 Article

Sperm head morphology is related to high deoxyribonucleic acid stainability assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 2495-2500

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.032

Keywords

Sperm; DNA fragmentation; nuclear condensation; sperm morphology; male infertility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the relationship between sperm strict morphology and sperm chromatin integrity. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Infertility clinic. Patient(s): Eighty-seven consecutive semen samples from non-azoospermic men presenting for infertility evaluation and 6 samples from fertile donors. Intervention(s): Assessment of standard semen parameters and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters (%DFI [DNA fragmentation index] and %HDS [high DNA stainability]). Evaluation of %HDS and %DFI after treatment with dithiothreitol (a thiol-reducing agent used to decondense sperm nuclei) was also undertaken. Main Outcome Measure(s): Relationship between sperm strict morphology defects and SCSA parameters (%DFI and %HDS). Result(s): We observed significant relationships between the percentage of normal sperm forms and both %HDS (r = -0.40) and sperm motility (r = 0.32). We also found significant relationships between sperm head defects and both %HDS (r = 0.40) and sperm concentration (r = -0.39). Sperm tail, midpiece, and neck defects were not significantly related to the SCSA parameters. Treatment of spermatozoa with dithiothreitol (to induce decondensation) resulted in a substantial increase in %HDS but no measurable change in %DFI. Conclusion(s): The observed relationship between sperm head defects and %HDS suggests that sperm head abnormalities may, in part, be due to incomplete sperm chromatin condensation. (Fertil Steril (R), 2009;91:2495-500. (c) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available