4.7 Article

Physical health at 5.5 years of age of term-born singletons after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: results of a prospective, controlled, single-blinded study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages 115-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.037

Keywords

ICSI; children; follow-up; health; development; hospitalization; singleton; term-born

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the health of children born after ICSI and of-spontaneously-conceived control children at the age of 4-6 years. Design: Prospective, controlled, blinded study. Setting: Tertiary-care center. Patient(s): Two hundred seventy-six term-born singletons conceived by ICSI and 273 matched spontaneously conceived singletons at the age of 5,5 years. Intervention(s): Detailed physical examination, interview of the parents, and collection of data from each child's examination booklet. Main Outcome Measure(s): Biometrical data; current health status; acute, chronic and childhood illnesses; hospitalizations; and surgeries, Result(s): Detailed physical examination did not reveal any relevant differences between ICSI and spontaneously conceived children. There were no relevant differences regarding the incidence of childhood illnesses, acute or chronic illnesses, accidents, and surgeries up to the age of 5.5 years. However, a history of untie, scended testicles was :found significantly more often in boys born after ICSI (5.4%.vs. 0.7%), with the consequence that they had significantly more urogenital surgery (19.2% vs. 8.9%). Significantly more ICSI children had been hospitalized (37.6% vs. 27.2%), although we did not find any specific reason for the increased hospitalization rate. Conclusion(s): Other than all increased risk of undescended testicles and therefore all increase in urogenital surgeries in ICSI boys, the physical health of ICSI children was comparable to flint of spontaneously conceived children at the age of 5.5 years. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:115-24. (c) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive, Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available