4.7 Article

Infertility induced by cancer treatment: inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 1616-1625

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.064

Keywords

Cancer; infertility; cryopreservation; patients' information; chemotherapy

Funding

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (LNCC, Paris, France)
  2. Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salaries (CNAMTS)
  3. Mutualite sociale agricole (MSA)
  4. Regime social des independants (RSI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe patients who reported treatment-induced infertility 2 years after cancer diagnosis and to highlight what factors are related to the patients' lack of information on this topic before starting therapy. Design: Cross-sectional study by telephone interview. Setting: Representative French national sample of survivors 2 years after cancer diagnosis. Patient(s): 282 women (<45 years) and 1137 men (<71 years). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Self-reported treatment-induced infertility, and what information was provided on this issue before starting treatment, including information on systematic sperm cryopreservation. Result(s): Among the participants. 104 women (37%) and 346 men (30%) reported having treatment-induced infertility. Among them, 31 women (30%) and 45 men (13%) reported that they had not been informed about the risk of infertility before they started treatment. Logistic regressions showed that a lack of information was associated with older age and treatment without hormone therapy among women and older age, cancers other than prostate, and a lack of participation in treatment decision-making among men. Conclusion(s): Information about infertility risks and preservation methods should be provided more systematically to all treated patients. irrespective of their age. (Fertil Steril(R)) 2008;90:1616-25. (C)2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available