4.7 Review

Pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis-associated infertility

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 247-257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.093

Keywords

endometriosis; oocyte quality; fertilization; implantation; pregnancy; assisted reproduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To review the mechanisms by which endometriosis may affect reproductive function. Design: Review of the English literature from 1986 to 2007 after searching Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and BIOSIS, as well as relevant meeting abstracts. Setting: Fertility research center and obstetrics and gynecology department in a tertiary care hospital. Result(s): There is compelling evidence in the literature that endometriosis has detrimental effects on ovarian and tubal function and uterine receptivity, resulting in female infertility. The mechanisms of infertility associated with endornetriosis remain controversial and include abnormal folliculogenesis, elevated oxidative stress, altered immune function, and hormonal milieu in the follicular and peritoneal environments, and reduced endometrial receptivity. These factors lead to poor oocyte quality, impaired fertilization, and implantation. Conclusion(s): Through unraveling the mechanisms by which endomettiosis leads to infertility, researchers are sure to find a nonsurgical means to diagnose endometriosis, most likely through serum and peritoneal markers, Cytokines, interleukins, oxidative stress markers, and soluble cellular adhesion molecules all show potential to be used as a reliable marker for diagnosing endometriosis. After analyzing the pathogenic mechanisms of endometri. osis, it seems that the future treatment of this entity may include cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, immunomodulators, or hormonal suppressive therapy to eliminate the need for surgical treatment of endometriosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available