4.7 Article

Accuracy of FISH analysis in predicting chromosomal status in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 1049-1054

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1337

Keywords

PGD; FISH; aneuploidy; confirmation; PPV; NPV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this Study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FISH analysis and to determine which chromosomal abnormalities are most frequently confirmed. Design: Prospective observational. Setting: IVF laboratory. Patient(s): Two hundred forty-one embryos were analyzed from 98 patients. Intervention(s): FISH reanalysis. Main Outcome Measure(s): Embryos that would have been discarded in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) were fixed and FISH reanalysis was performed. Results of reanalysis were compared with the day 3 diagnosis while PPV and NPV were calculated. Result(s): Among the 241 embryos, 198 embryos were abnormal and 43 were normal by day 3 FISH analysis. The PPV was 83% and the NPV was 81%. PPV was also determined for specific categories of aneuploidy, and certain abnormalities such as monosomies, trisomies, tetrasomies, and polyploidies were frequently confirmed on reanalysis (PPV >80%), whereas Turner syndrome diagnosis was not (PPV = 17%). Conclusion(s): FISH analysis offers a PPV of 83% and NPV of 81% when evaluating a single blastomere in conjunction with PGD. FISH errors and mosaicism are primarily responsible for the errors associated with FISH analysis in PGD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available