4.7 Article

Effects of polycystic ovarian syndrome on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcomes are influenced by body mass index

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 2304-2309

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.077

Keywords

PCOS; obesity; IVF-embryo transfer; ICSI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) adversely impacts IVF-embryo transfer outcomes in obese compared to lean patients. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: University-affiliated infertility program. Patient(s): Lean non-PCOS (n = 52), lean PCOS (n = 6), obese non-PCOS (n = 18), and obese PCOS (n = 10). Intervention(s): Ninety-four fresh nondonor IVF-embryo transfer cycles analyzed. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cycle characteristics, clinical pregnancy (PR) and live birth rates. Result(s): Lean PCOS had more dominant follicles (12.2 +/- 6.0 vs. 7.7 +/- 3.6), retrieved oocytes (22.2 +/- 9.2 vs. 12.6 +/- 5.8), and frozen embryos (5 +/- 4.6 vs. 1.4 +/- 2.6) than lean non-PCOS. Lean PCOS also used fewer gonadotropin ampules (18.8 +/- 6.0 vs. 29.2 +/- 14.2). but had more retrieved oocytes (22.2 +/- 9.2 vs. 14.3 +/- 4.9) than obese PCOS. Obese non-PCOS had better-grade embryos (2.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.8) and fewer embryos transferred (2.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.6) than obese PCOS. but more embryos frozen than lean non-PCOS (3.2 +/- 3.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 2.6). Implantation rates trended downward in obese patients with PCOS, but no other differences were observed. Conclusion(S): Patients with PCOS with a body mass index (BMI) in the lean rather than the obese range have more favorable assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle characteristics but show no clinical outcome differences. (Fertil Steril (R) 2008;90:2304-9. (C) 2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available