4.3 Article

The ASP3 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae originated by horizontal gene transfer from Wickerhamomyces

Journal

FEMS YEAST RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 859-863

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00828.x

Keywords

asparagine metabolism; horizontal gene transfer; gene duplication; metabolic diversity; phylogenetics

Funding

  1. Searle Scholars Program
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-0805625, DEB-0844968]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The asparagine degradation pathway in the S288c laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is comprised of genes located at two separate loci. ASP1 is located on chromosome IV and encodes for cytosolic l-asparaginase I, whereas ASP3 contains a gene cluster located on chromosome XII comprised of four identical genes, ASP3-1, ASP3-2, ASP3-3, and ASP3-4, which encode for cell wall-associated l-asparaginase II. Interestingly, the ASP3 locus appears to be only present, in variable copy number, in S.similar to cerevisiae strains isolated from laboratory or industrial environments and is completely absent from the genomes of 128 diverse fungal species. Investigation of the evolutionary history of ASP3 across these 128 genomes as well as across the genomes of 43 S.similar to cerevisiae strains shows that ASP3 likely arose in a S.similar to cerevisiae strain via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from, or a close relative of, the wine yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus, which co-occurs with S.similar to cerevisiae in several biotechnological processes. Thus, because the ASP3 present in the S288c laboratory strain of S.similar to cerevisiae is induced in response to nitrogen starvation, its acquisition may have aided yeast adaptation to artificial environments. Our finding that the ASP3 locus in S.similar to cerevisiae originated via HGT further highlights the importance of gene sharing between yeasts in the evolution of their remarkable metabolic diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available