4.3 Article

Is the abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii relevant to Crohn's disease?

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 310, Issue 2, Pages 138-144

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02057.x

Keywords

Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; irritable bowel syndrome; Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; butyrate; faecal bacteria

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT080238MA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reports that bacteria within the Firmicutes phylum, especially the species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, are less abundant in Crohn's disease (CD) patients and supernatants from cultures of this bacterium are anti-inflammatory prompted the investigation of the possible correlations between the abundance of F. prausnitzii and the response to treatment in patients with gut diseases and healthy controls. In a randomized, double-blind trial, faeces were collected from healthy volunteers, and from patients with active CD, ulcerative colitis (UC) and irritable bowel syndrome before and after treatment. The levels of F. prausnitzii DNA in faecal suspensions were determined by PCR. Treatment by an elemental diet was effective, resulting in decreases in both the Harvey and Bradshaw index (P < 0.001) and the concentrations of serum C-reactive protein (P < 0.05). The total levels of F. prausnitzii in faecal samples from CD patients at presentation were lower than those in the other groups both before and after the treatment. There was no correlation between F. prausnitzii abundance and the severity of CD before treatment. Clinical improvement unexpectedly correlated with a significant decrease in the abundance of F. prausnitzii, especially the A2-165 subgroup (P < 0.05). Our data suggest that a paucity of F. prausnitzii in the gastrointestinal microbial communities is likely to be a minor aetiological factor in CD: recovery following elemental diet is attributed to lower levels of gut flora.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available