4.5 Article

Distinct bacterial assemblages reside at different depths in Arctic multiyear sea ice

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 115-125

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12377

Keywords

sea ice; depth profile; bacteria

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery
  2. Polar Continental Shelf Program (PCSP)
  3. Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures Fellow
  4. Northern Scientific Training Program (NSTP)
  5. Circumpolar-Boreal Arctic Research (C-BAR) programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial communities in Arctic sea ice play an important role in the regulation of nutrient and energy dynamics in the Arctic Ocean. Sea ice has vertical gradients in temperature, brine salinity and volume, and light and UV levels. Multiyear ice (MYI) has at least two distinct ice layers: old fresh ice with limited permeability, and new saline ice, and may also include a surface melt pond layer. Here, we determine whether bacterial communities (1) differ with ice depth due to strong physical and chemical gradients, (2) are relatively homogenous within a layer, but differ between layers, or (3) do not vary with ice depth. Cores of MYI off northern Ellesmere Island, NU, Canada, were subsectioned in 30-cm intervals, and the bacterial assemblage structure was characterized using 16S rRNA gene pyrotag sequencing. Assemblages clustered into three distinct groups: top (0-30cm); middle (30-150cm); and bottom (150-236cm). These layers correspond to the occurrence of refrozen melt pond ice, at least 2-year-old ice, and newly grown first-year ice at the bottom of the ice sheet, respectively. Thus, MYI houses multiple distinct bacterial assemblages, and in situ conditions appear to play a less important role in structuring microbial assemblages than the age or conditions of the ice at the time of formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available