4.5 Article

Host species and developmental stage, but not host social structure, affects bacterial community structure in socially polymorphic bees

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 398-406

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12302

Keywords

facultative sociality; microbiota; pollinator conservation; bee-associated bacteria

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [PRFB-1003133, DEB-0919519]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0919519] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social transmission and host developmental stage are thought to profoundly affect the structure of bacterial communities associated with honey bees and bumble bees, but these ideas have not been explored in other bee species. The halictid bees Megalopta centralis and M.genalis exhibit intrapopulation social polymorphism, which we exploit to test whether bacterial communities differ by host social structure, developmental stage, or host species. We collected social and solitary Megalopta nests and sampled bees and nest contents from all stages of host development. To survey these bacterial communities, we used 16S rRNA gene 454 pyrosequencing. We found no effect of social structure, but found differences by host species and developmental stage. Wolbachia prevalence differed between the two host species. Bacterial communities associated with different developmental stages appeared to be driven by environmentally acquired bacteria. A Lactobacillus kunkeei clade bacterium that is consistently associated with other bee species was dominant in pollen provisions and larval samples, but less abundant in mature larvae and pupae. Foraging adults appeared to often reacquire L.kunkeei clade bacteria, likely while foraging at flowers. Environmental transmission appears to be more important than social transmission for Megalopta bees at the cusp between social and solitary behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available