4.5 Article

Global biogeography of Streptomyces antibiotic inhibition, resistance, and resource use

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 386-397

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12307

Keywords

Streptomyces; functional biogeography; local adaptation; antibiotic resistance; species interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-67019-30200, 2006-04464]
  2. NSF Long-Term Ecological Research Network [0620652]
  3. NSF [0537143]
  4. Division Of Polar Programs
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0537143] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although recent molecular techniques have greatly expanded our knowledge of microbial biogeography, the functional biogeography of soil microorganisms remains poorly understood. In this work, we explore geographic variation in Streptomyces phenotypes that are critical to species interactions. Specifically, we characterize Streptomyces from different locations from multiple continents for antibiotic inhibition, resistance, and resource use phenotypes. Streptomyces from different locations varied significantly in antibiotic inhibition, resistance, and resource use indicating that communities vary in functional potential. Among all isolates, there were substantial differences in antibiotic inhibition, resistance, and resource use within and among and within Streptomyces species. Moreover, Streptomyces with near-identical 16S rRNA gene sequences from different locations sometimes differed significantly in inhibition, resistance, and resource use phenotypes, suggesting that these phenotypes may be locally adapted. Thus, in addition to a likely role of environmental filtering, variation in Streptomyces inhibitory, resistance, and resource use phenotypes among locations is likely to be a consequence of local selection mediated by species interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available