4.5 Article

Both species sorting and neutral processes drive assembly of bacterial communities in aquatic microcosms

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 288-302

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12161

Keywords

microcosms; niche theory; Gini coefficient; neutral theory; stochastic immigration; species sorting

Categories

Funding

  1. RSNZ Marsden Fund [LIU0901]
  2. VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A focus of ecology is to determine drivers of community assembly. Here, we investigate effects of immigration and species sorting (environmental selection) on structuring aquatic bacterial communities in both colonised and previously uncolonised environments. We used nonsterilised and presterilised water from three chemically distinct ponds to establish microcosms, which were opened for 12, 24, 48, 96 or 167h and then closed again to allow airborne bacterial immigration and subsequent succession. Community similarity, richness, evenness and the parameters of a neutral model were investigated after 167h. Immigration appeared to govern the assembly of communities in the presterilised water as there were no significant differences in evenness among microcosm communities containing water from each pond. Statistical estimation of neutral model parameters confirmed these findings, because the estimated immigration rate changed significantly with time of exposure to immigration. Species sorting also occurred because significant differences in community similarity (for presterilised and nonsterilised communities) and evenness (only for nonsterilised communities) were detected among microcosms containing different pond water; the magnitude of these differences was greater for communities in nonsterilised microcosms. Our study provides evidence for both processes being important during the colonisation of aquatic environments and presents a novel way to apply the neutral model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available