4.5 Review

The relative contribution of methanotrophs to microbial communities and carbon cycling in soil overlying a coal-bed methane seep

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 474-494

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12079

Keywords

phospholipid fatty acids; 13C; 14C; coal-bed methane; methanotroph

Categories

Funding

  1. American Chemical Society - Petroleum Research Fund (ACS-PRF) [34165-AC2]
  2. Four Corners Geologic Society
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Canadian Foundation of Innovation
  5. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seepage of coal-bed methane (CBM) through soils is a potential source of atmospheric CH4 and also a likely source of ancient (i.e. 14C-dead) carbon to soil microbial communities. Natural abundance 13C and 14C compositions of bacterial membrane phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) and soil gas CO2 and CH4 were used to assess the incorporation of CBM-derived carbon into methanotrophs and other members of the soil microbial community. Concentrations of type I and type II methanotroph PLFA biomarkers (16:18c and 18:18c, respectively) were elevated in CBM-impacted soils compared with a control site. Comparison of PLFA and 16s rDNA data suggested type I and II methanotroph populations were well estimated and overestimated by their PLFA biomarkers, respectively. The 13C values of PLFAs common in type I and II methanotrophs were as negative as 67 parts per thousand and consistent with the assimilation of CBM. PLFAs more indicative of nonmethanotrophic bacteria had 13C values that were intermediate indicating assimilation of both plant- and CBM-derived carbon. 14C values of select PLFAs (351 to 936 parts per thousand) indicated similar patterns of CBM assimilation by methanotrophs and nonmethanotrophs and were used to estimate that 3591% of carbon assimilated by nonmethanotrophs was derived from CBM depending on time of sampling and soil depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available