3.9 Article

Bacterial diversity in suspected prosthetic joint infections: an exploratory study using 16S rRNA gene analysis

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 291-304

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00949.x

Keywords

prosthetic joint infection; biofilm; 16S rRNA gene; clone library; phylogeny; quantitative PCR

Funding

  1. Danish Agency of Science and Technology [09-052174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formation of biofilm is a prominent feature of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and constitutes a challenge to current sampling procedures and culture practices. Molecular techniques have a potential for improving diagnosis of biofilm-adapted, slow-growing and non-culturable bacteria. In this exploratory study we investigated the bacterial diversity in specimens from 22 patients clinically suspected of having PJIs. Bacteriological cultures were performed according to standard practice. A total of 55 specimens from 25 procedures (specimen sets) were submitted to broad range 16S rRNA gene PCR, cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. More than 40 bacterial taxa within six phyla were identified in 14 specimen sets originating from 11 patients. Direct observation of biofilm was made in selected specimens by fluorescence in situ hydridization. 16S rRNA gene analysis and bacteriological cultures were concordant for 15/25 specimen sets (60%; five positive, 10 negative); additional taxa were detected in four sets by gene analysis, and discrepant results were obtained for six sets, five of which were negative on culture. Polymicrobial communities were revealed in 9/14 sets by gene analysis and 1/10 sets by culture (P < 0.05). Although our study was not conclusive, these findings are consistent with a primary role of biofilm formation in PJIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available