3.9 Article

Characterization of a mixed MRSA/MRSE biofilm in an explanted total ankle arthroplasty

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 66-74

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00793.x

Keywords

biofilm; joint infection; prosthetic; arthroplasty; PCR

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIDCR DE014780]
  2. HRSA [C76HF06163]
  3. Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial biofilms have been observed in many prosthesis-related infections, and this mode of growth renders the infection both difficult to treat and especially difficult to detect and diagnose using standard culture methods. We (1) tested a novel coupled PCR-mass spectrometric (PCR-MS) assay (the Ibis T5000) on an ankle arthroplasty that was culture negative on preoperative aspiration and then (2) confirmed that the Ibis assay had in fact detected a viable multispecies biofilm by further micrographic and molecular examinations, including confocal microscopy using Live/Dead stain, bacterial FISH, and reverse-transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay for bacterial mRNA. The Ibis technology detected Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the methicillin resistance gene mecA in soft tissues associated with the explanted hardware. Viable S. aureus were confirmed using RT-PCR, and viable cocci in the biofilm configuration were detected microscopically on both tissue and hardware. Species-specific bacterial FISH confirmed a polymicrobial biofilm containing S. aureus. A novel culture method recovered S. aureus and S. epidermidis (both methicillin resistant) from the tibial metal component. These observations suggest that molecular methods, particularly the new Ibis methodology, may be a useful adjunct to routine cultures in the detection of biofilm bacteria in prosthetic joint infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available