3.9 Article

Aberrant structures of fecal bacterial community in allergic infants profiled by 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 397-406

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00872.x

Keywords

infant; allergy; fecal microbiota; gastrointestinal tract; pyrosequence; 16S rRNA gene

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Danon Institute for promotion of health and nutrition
  5. Morinaga Hoshikai
  6. Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the correlation between fecal bacteria composition in early infancy and the prevalence of allergic diseases in late infancy. The fecal microbiota in the first 2 similar to months was profiled using the 16S rRNA V6 short-tag sequences in the community and statistically compared between two groups of subjects who did and did not show allergic symptoms in the first 2 similar to years (n similar to=similar to 11 vs. 11). In the allergic group, genus Bacteroides at 1 similar to month and genera Propionibacterium and Klebsiella at 2 similar to months were more abundant, and genera Acinetobacter and Clostridium at 1 similar to month were less abundant than in the nonallergic group. Allergic infants who showed high colonization of Bacteroides and/or Klebsiella showed less colonization of Clostridium perfringens/butyricum, suggesting antagonism between these bacterial groups in the gastrointestinal tract. It was also remarkable that the relative abundance of total Proteobacteria, excluding genus Klebsiella, was significantly lower in the allergic than in the nonallergic group at the age of 1 similar to month. These results indicate that pyrosequence-based 16S rRNA gene profiling is valid to find the intestinal microbiotal disorder that correlates with allergy development in later life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available