3.9 Article

Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 60-70

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00662.x

Keywords

Lactobacillus; species and strain-specific immunomodulation; hPBMC; cytokines; probiotic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lactic acid bacterial strains have received interest for their immunomodulating activities and potential use in probiotic products. A wide variety of strain-dependent properties have been reported, but comparative studies at the species level are scarce. The objective of this study was to assess the immunomodulatory effect of Lactobacillus species on the cytokine profiles and proliferative response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMC), and in particular, on the comparison between the species Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum. hPBMC from healthy donors were stimulated in the presence or absence of the lactic acid bacteria, and cytokine production, surface marker staining, proliferation and cell death were determined after 1 and 4 days of culture. All Lactobacillus strains tested were capable of inducing the production of interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-10, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). The bacterial strains did not differentially influence the amount of proliferating, viable, apoptotic and necrotic cells. Generally, L. plantarum showed a significantly higher induction capacity of IFN-gamma, IL-12 and TNF-alpha compared with L. acidophilus. We conclude that the variation in immunomodulatory effects between species is even larger than the variation between the strains of the same species. In addition, we demonstrate that L. plantarum strains are most potent in skewing the T-cell differentiation toward a putative Th1 response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available