3.9 Article

Studies on the susceptibility of different culture morphotypes of Listeria monocytogenes to uptake and survival in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 183-192

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00597.x

Keywords

Listeria monocytogenes; atypical cell morphotypes; opsonization; survival; PMNLs

Funding

  1. Republic of Ireland, Technical Sector Research: Strand 1 program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated that atypical virulent filaments of Listeria monocytogenes (rough variant type II and designated FR for this study), isolated from clinical specimens or generated during exposure to pulsed-plasma gas discharge in liquids, were shown to be capable of survival when engulfed by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs). Factors shown to significantly influence the maximal respiratory burst response in PMNLs and survival of different internalized cell or filament forms of L. monocytogenes were bacterial strain, culture form, degree of opsonization (with and without the use of 10% serum) and composition of the bacterial growth media used before uptake by PMNLs. Opsonized regular-sized L. monocytogenes cells grown on blood agar (BA) elicited the greatest respiratory burst response and survived best in PMNLs. The filamentous (FR) and multiple cell chain (MCR) rough variants were significantly less susceptible to uptake and survival in PMNLs. Supplementation of tryptone soya agar with hemin resulted in significantly reduced chemiluminescence responses in phagocytosing PMNLs compared with the maximal levels observed from prior bacterial growth on BA or brain heart infusion agar that also contained a source of iron. The MCR variants secreting decreased levels of a peptidoglycan hydrolase CwhA protein exhibited the lowest percentage survival when internalized in PMNLs compared with wild-type smooth or FR culture variants as determined by the macrophage-killing assay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available