4.5 Review

Mix and match: Investigating heteromeric and heterotypic gap junction channels in model systems and native tissues

Journal

FEBS LETTERS
Volume 588, Issue 8, Pages 1193-1204

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.025

Keywords

Connexin; Gap junction; Quality control; Membrane transport

Funding

  1. Emory Alcohol and Lung Biology Center [P50-AA013757]
  2. [R01-HL116958]
  3. [T32-AA013528]
  4. [R01-HL058732]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review is based in part on a roundtable discussion session: Physiological roles for heterotypic/heteromeric channels at the 2013 International Gap Junction Conference (IGJC 2013) in Charleston, South Carolina. It is well recognized that multiple connexins can specifically co- assemble to form mixed gap junction channels with unique properties as a means to regulate intercellular communication. Compatibility determinants for both heteromeric and heterotypic gap junction channel formation have been identified and associated with specific connexin amino acid motifs. Hetero- oligomerization is also a regulated process; differences in connexin quality control and monomer stability are likely to play integral roles to control interactions between compatible connexins. Gap junctions in oligodendrocyte: astrocyte communication and in the cardiovascular system have emerged as key systems where heterotypic and heteromeric channels have unique physiologic roles. There are several methodologies to study heteromeric and heterotypic channels that are best applied to either heterologous expression systems, native tissues or both. There remains a need to use and develop different experimental approaches in order to understand the prevalence and roles for mixed gap junction channels in human physiology. (c) 2014 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available