4.5 Review

Redundancy and divergence in the amyloid precursor protein family

Journal

FEBS LETTERS
Volume 587, Issue 13, Pages 2036-2045

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.026

Keywords

Amyloid precursor protein; Amyloid like precursor protein; Evolution; Cortex; Functional divergence

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC)
  2. Queen Elisabeth Foundation
  3. Fonds voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek (FWO)
  4. Federal office for scientific affair, IUAP [P7/16]
  5. KULeuven
  6. VIB
  7. Methusalem grant of the Flemish Government
  8. Bax-Vanluffelen chair for Alzheimer Disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene duplication provides genetic material required for functional diversification. An interesting example is the amyloid precursor protein (APP) protein family. The APP gene family has experienced both expansion and contraction during evolution. The three mammalian members have been studied quite extensively in combined knock out models. The underlying assumption is that APP, amyloid precursor like protein 1 and 2 (APLP1, APLP2) are functionally redundant. This assumption is primarily supported by the similarities in biochemical processing of APP and APLPs and on the fact that the different APP genes appear to genetically interact at the level of the phenotype in combined knockout mice. However, unique features in each member of the APP family possibly contribute to specification of their function. In the current review, we discuss the evolution and the biology of the APP protein family with special attention to the distinct properties of each homologue. We propose that the functions of APP, APLP1 and APLP2 have diverged after duplication to contribute distinctly to different neuronal events. Our analysis reveals that APLP2 is significantly diverged from APP and APLP1. (c) 2013 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available